From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Arnd Bergmann To: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] selection of CPU optimization Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:25:57 +0200 References: <20070410111508.GA2969@localhost.localdomain> <200704121926.03723.arnd@arndb.de> <04335E0C-3963-4849-BEC7-DC9DF3E3280F@kernel.crashing.org> In-Reply-To: <04335E0C-3963-4849-BEC7-DC9DF3E3280F@kernel.crashing.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Message-Id: <200704122125.57484.arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev list , cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thursday 12 April 2007, Kumar Gala wrote: > > What would be the right options to pass on e200 and on > > pa6t? > > I think leaving it blank is the right thing for e200. Leaving it blank means it will use the compiler's default target, which can be anything. My guess is that '-mcpu=powerpc' would be right, i.e. no 64 bit, no POWER, but most PowerPC instructions are allowed. Arnd <><