From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jean Delvare Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 08:43:07 +0000 Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 2/2 RESEND] hwmon: documentation for new Message-Id: <20070413104307.1ef0356f@hyperion.delvare> List-Id: References: <191fb4ca0703220947s7e16453j4a5a7eb5eee77f1b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <191fb4ca0703220947s7e16453j4a5a7eb5eee77f1b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lm-sensors@vger.kernel.org Hi Juerg, On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 15:57:14 -0700, Juerg Haefliger wrote: > > > +pwm[5-6]_enable RO Enable of PWM outputs 5-6. Always > > > + returns 1 since these 2 outputs are > > > + hard-wired to manual mode. > > > > Note that other drivers do not create the file in this case. It is > > assumed that PWM is always manual if pwmN exists and pwmN_enable > > doesn't. > > I tried to make it consistent for this driver. If it breaks a common > standard I will remove these attributes. No, I'm fine either way. It was only a random comment. > > > +pmw[1-3]_ramp_rate RW Ramp rate of PWM output. Determines how > > > + fast the PWM duty-cycle will change > > > + when the PWM is in automatic mode. > > > + Expressed in ms per PWM step size. > > > > s/step size/step/ > > Sorry, I don't get this. I don't think that "expressed in ms per PWM step size" makes much sense, "expressed in ms per PWM step" sounds better. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors