From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [195.149.226.213] (helo=smtp.host4.kei.pl) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HcIOS-0000Ti-Ci for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:48:36 +0200 Received: (qmail 29489 invoked by uid 813007); 13 Apr 2007 09:48:35 -0000 X-clamdmail: clamdmail 0.18a Received: from v813.rev.tld.pl (HELO home.local) (marcin@hrw.one.pl@195.149.226.213) by smtp.host4.kei.pl with ESMTPA; 13 Apr 2007 09:48:35 -0000 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:48:31 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <461F4C4A.7010401@whitby.id.au> In-Reply-To: <461F4C4A.7010401@whitby.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <200704131148.32947.openembedded@hrw.one.pl> Subject: Re: Where should MACHINE_TASK_PROVIDER be defined? X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:48:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Dnia pi=B1tek, 13 kwietnia 2007, Rod Whitby napisa=B3: > There seems to be significant inconsistency in the way that > MACHINE_TASK_PROVIDER is defined in OE (see the output of a recursive > grep command in .../conf at the end of this message). > > It's defaulted to "task-base" in bitbake.conf, and then every man and > his dog forcibly defines it to the same thing in a variety of > machine.conf files and distro.conf files. > > Should all of these instances simply be deleted Yes - most of them are from time when we had task-bootstrap as default. =2D-=20 JID: hrw-jabber.org OpenEmbedded developer/consultant Packrat's Credo: I have no use for it, but I hate to see it go to waste.