From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
lenb@kernel.org, "linux-acpi@vger" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 15:59:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070413155949.GA9157@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200704071308.07571.david-b@pacbell.net>
Hi!
> > Are you _sure_ you have a 1-to-1 relationship here? No multiple devices
> > pointing to the same acpi node? Or the other way around? If so, you
> > are going to have to change the name to be something more unique.
>
> I've wondered that too. The short answer: APCI only supports 1-1
> here. It will emit warnings if it tries to bind more than one ACPI
...
> Assuming they all adopt that same "parallel tree" model, that seems
> like a good idea. The tools will likely need to understand how ACPI
> and OF differ, but there's no point in reserving more names than we
> really need. Though it may be that "parallel trees" should go away.
If mapping is indeed 1-to-1 in acpi... it would be nice to just merge
the trees.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-15 9:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 0:41 [patch 2.6.21-rc5-git] make /proc/acpi/wakeup more useful David Brownell
2007-04-05 7:59 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-05 10:58 ` David Brownell
2007-04-06 9:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-06 15:43 ` David Brownell
2007-04-07 5:01 ` Greg KH
2007-04-07 20:08 ` David Brownell
2007-04-09 2:36 ` Zhang Rui
2007-04-09 5:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-10 23:29 ` David Brownell
2007-04-11 0:10 ` David Brownell
2007-04-13 15:59 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2007-04-17 19:53 ` David Brownell
2007-04-17 21:57 ` David Brownell
2007-04-18 3:03 ` Greg KH
2007-04-18 3:25 ` David Brownell
2007-04-05 9:26 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-04-05 10:35 ` David Brownell
2007-04-25 19:22 ` Len Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070413155949.GA9157@ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david-b@pacbell.net \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.