From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752462AbXDOJHP (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:07:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752540AbXDOJHP (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:07:15 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:57869 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752462AbXDOJHN (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Apr 2007 05:07:13 -0400 Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 11:06:16 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Bill Huey Cc: Mike Galbraith , Con Kolivas , ck list , Peter Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Nick Piggin , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] Message-ID: <20070415090616.GF24886@elte.hu> References: <20070413202100.GA9957@elte.hu> <200704151327.13589.kernel@kolivas.org> <1176619384.6222.70.camel@Homer.simpson.net> <20070415083616.GA29878@gnuppy.monkey.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070415083616.GA29878@gnuppy.monkey.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Bill Huey wrote: > On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 08:43:04AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > [...] > > > > Demystify what? The casual observer need only read either your > > attempt > > Here's the problem. You're a casual observer and obviously not paying > attention. guys, please calm down. Judging by the number of contributions to sched.c the main folks who are not 'observers' here and who thus have an unalienable right to be involved in a nasty flamewar about scheduler interactivity are Con, Mike, Nick and me ;-) Everyone else is just a happy bystander, ok? ;-) Ingo