From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753694AbXDQLMU (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:12:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753698AbXDQLMU (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:12:20 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:57471 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753686AbXDQLMT (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 07:12:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:11:59 +0200 From: Nick Piggin To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Andy Whitcroft , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Con Kolivas , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner , Steve Fox , Nishanth Aravamudan Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] Message-ID: <20070417111159.GA5122@wotan.suse.de> References: <20070413202100.GA9957@elte.hu> <46247DAB.1060808@shadowen.org> <20070417093257.GA9267@wotan.suse.de> <20070417095900.GB25553@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070417095900.GB25553@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:59:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Nick Piggin wrote: > > > 2.6.21-rc7-cfs-v2 > > 534.80user 30.92system 2:23.64elapsed 393%CPU > > 534.75user 31.01system 2:23.70elapsed 393%CPU > > 534.66user 31.07system 2:23.76elapsed 393%CPU > > 534.56user 30.91system 2:23.76elapsed 393%CPU > > 534.66user 31.07system 2:23.67elapsed 393%CPU > > 535.43user 30.62system 2:23.72elapsed 393%CPU > > Thanks for testing this! Could you please try this also with: > > echo 100000000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity > > on the same system, so that we can get a complete set of numbers? Just > to make sure that lowering the preemption frequency indeed has the > expected result of moving kernbench numbers back to mainline levels. (if > not then that would indicate some CFS buglet) > > could you maybe even try a more extreme setting of: > > echo 500000000 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity > > for kicks? This would allow us to see how much kernbench we lose due to > preemption granularity. Thanks! Yeah but I just powered down the test-box, so I'll have to get onto that tomorrow.