From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422704AbXDRJRg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:17:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422696AbXDRJRg (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:17:36 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:47785 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422694AbXDRJRd (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:17:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 11:17:14 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Christoph Pfister Cc: =?utf-8?B?Uy7Dh2HEn2xhcg==?= Onur , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Lothian , Christophe Thommeret , Jurgen Kofler , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: Kaffeine problem with CFS Message-ID: <20070418091714.GA23446@elte.hu> References: <200704141809.58737.caglar@pardus.org.tr> <20070414160939.GB3099@elte.hu> <200704141959.50076.caglar@pardus.org.tr> <20070415161348.GA30625@elte.hu> <20070415162508.GA4526@elte.hu> <19a3b7a80704150955x4e1d809eh929b0f931f842a06@mail.gmail.com> <20070418082744.GA14009@elte.hu> <19a3b7a80704180157g604f4cecna51a49bd1f4c7d38@mail.gmail.com> <20070418090117.GA20764@elte.hu> <19a3b7a80704180213i1ac84b2ch2b35220b62e3b67a@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <19a3b7a80704180213i1ac84b2ch2b35220b62e3b67a@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Christoph Pfister wrote: > >are the updated backtraces in the followup mail i just sent more > >useful? (I still have that stuck session running so i can whatever > >debugging you'd like to see done.) > > QWidget::setUpdatesEnabled() is (wrongly) present in every thread > except the main. So I'm afraid there's nothing which can be done :-/ > Btw the main thread is waiting for the first frame being displayed > after the seek. i didnt have all the debuginfo packages installed. I installed some (but not all yet), here's an updated backtrace: (gdb) bt #0 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x4a2539e1 in __lll_mutex_unlock_wake () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x4a2506f9 in _L_mutex_unlock_99 () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #3 0x4a250370 in __pthread_mutex_unlock_usercnt () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #4 0x4a2506f0 in pthread_mutex_unlock () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #5 0xb79fce5a in QWidget::setUpdatesEnabled () from /usr/lib/libxine.so.1 #6 0xb7a4b90b in dvd_plugin_free_buffer (buf=0xb0745470) at input_dvd.c:570 #7 0xb7a030a2 in QWidget::setUpdatesEnabled () from /usr/lib/libxine.so.1 #8 0x4a24d2db in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0 #9 0x4a05820e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6 at least the dvd_plugin_free_buffer() call has been resolved now. (I'll hunt for the other debuginfo packages too.) which thread would be the most interesting to you - 9324? Ingo