From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766890AbXDSRfA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:35:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1766895AbXDSRfA (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:35:00 -0400 Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com ([66.249.82.235]:17110 "EHLO wx-out-0506.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766890AbXDSRe7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:34:59 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=c200GHxyzaiCw6ZXbHQnY3o16cQn3LA7UeEYqZ+v46zzOy2/ordalf4qrZfQGnFtkEOmVklNDKb4p6eCws+q33n/BiFG2JHQyNRlk3f++wOWRG7y90dznZ56U6QVs2AWT0HjGf12ADMIlzOb24u87MFmy82AexbK/B8W+Ow4V8s= From: Gene Heskett Organization: Organization? very little To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:34:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 Cc: Willy Tarreau , Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Con Kolivas , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Thomas Gleixner References: <20070413202100.GA9957@elte.hu> <20070419125438.GA27584@1wt.eu> <20070419151803.GB30959@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20070419151803.GB30959@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200704191334.55649.gene.heskett@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 19 April 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote: >* Willy Tarreau wrote: >> You can certainly script it with -geometry. But it is the wrong >> application for this matter, because you benchmark X more than >> glxgears itself. What would be better is something like a line >> rotating 360 degrees and doing some short stuff between each degree, >> so that X is not much sollicitated, but the CPU would be spent more on >> the processes themselves. > >at least on my setup glxgears goes via DRI/DRM so there's no X >scheduling inbetween at all, and the visual appearance of glxgears is a >direct function of its scheduling. > > Ingo That doesn't appear to be the case here Ingo. Even when I know the rest of the system is lagged, glxgears continues to show very smooth and steady movement. -- Cheers, Gene "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Yow! I just went below the poverty line!