From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: [PATCH] user-manual.txt: Some doc updates Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:02:35 -0400 Message-ID: <20070419160235.GE9101@fieldses.org> References: <87hcrcjre3.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Git Mailing List To: Santi =?iso-8859-1?Q?B=E9jar?= X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Apr 19 18:03:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HeZ5z-0003ck-4C for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:02:55 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1766829AbXDSQCj convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:02:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1766833AbXDSQCj (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:02:39 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:41031 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1766829AbXDSQCh (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:02:37 -0400 Received: from bfields by fieldses.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1HeZ5f-00036N-9r; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 12:02:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87hcrcjre3.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Thanks! Just a couple things I noticed on a quick skim: On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:49:40PM +0200, Santi B=E9jar wrote: >=20 > * use "git config" instead of directly editing config files It was a conscious decision to use a mixture of the two techniques; see= , e.g., http://marc.info/?l=3Dgit&m=3D116994435503452&w=3D2 and followups. > * git branch {,-a,-r} list local, all or remote branches >=20 > * git branch -d checkd for reachability from the current branch >=20 > * refs/remotes/${remote}/HEAD does not depend on the number of branch= es >=20 > * log family can use the --reverse flag Given the number of options available, we have to make some hard decisions about which are worth mentioning in the manual and which can be left to the man pages. The --reverse option doesn't seem important enough to be worth a mention at this point, but I'd listen to reason. The best way to work in --reverse, I think, would be in an examples section as part of a pipeline that needed to get commits in --reverse order. I can't think of one off hand. --b.