From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: arm and ppc plattforms Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:01:06 -0400 Message-ID: <20070420160106.GA21151@thunk.org> References: <1177066595.5648.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070420110819.GN9554@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Peter Feuerer , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Schwebel Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:46105 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1767152AbXDTQBO (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:01:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070420110819.GN9554@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rt-users.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:08:19PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:56:35PM +0200, Peter Feuerer wrote: > > what ARM and PowerPC processors have been tested with the rt-preempt > > patch? Which evalkits or developement boards for those processors are > > you using? > > We have it running on > > - MPC5200B (PowerPC 603e), phyCORE-MPC5200B-tiny module (Phytec AG) > Works like a charm... > > - PXA270 (XScale ARMv5), phyCORE-PXA270 (Phytec AG) > Still under development, we've seen sporadic hangs with the last > kernels we checked, have to re-test on -rt-current. > > - netX (ARM926EZ-J), all Hilscher Boards (Hilscher) > Works, although more testing needs to be done. > > - IXP425 (XScale Big Endian), customer specific board > Works perfectly. Hi Robert, You mind if I add these to along with your name/conctact to: http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT_Patch#Platforms_Tested_and_in_Use_with_CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT ... or maybe you could add these platforms yourself? I think it would be useful if we had a collated set of tested platforms on the real-time wiki. I'm sure Peter isn't the only one who might be interested in this kind of information! - Ted