From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751580AbXDUIgV (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:36:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754529AbXDUIgV (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:36:21 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:57255 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751580AbXDUIgU (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Apr 2007 04:36:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 10:36:08 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Bill Davidsen Cc: caglar@pardus.org.tr, Christoph Pfister , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michael Lothian , Christophe Thommeret , Jurgen Kofler , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: Kaffeine problem with CFS Message-ID: <20070421083608.GC29800@elte.hu> References: <19a3b7a80704150955x4e1d809eh929b0f931f842a06@mail.gmail.com> <200704181625.51389.caglar@pardus.org.tr> <20070418154811.GA16842@elte.hu> <200704190008.19262.caglar@pardus.org.tr> <4629152C.7020801@tmr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4629152C.7020801@tmr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.0.3 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Instead of that one, i tried CFSv3 and i cannot reproduce the hang > > anymore, Thanks!... > > And that explains why CFS-v3 on 21-rc7-git3 wouldn't show me the hang. > As a matter of fact, nothing I did showed any bad behavior! Note that > I was doing actual badly behaved things which do sometimes glitch the > standard scheduler, not running benchmarks. > > This scheduler is boring, everything works. [...] hehe :) Having a 'boring' scheduler in the end is the main goal :) > [...] I am going to try some tests on a uniprocessor, though, I have > been running everything on either SMP or HT CPUs. But so far it looks > fine. yeah, please do - while i do test UP frequently, most of my CFS testing was on SMP. Ingo