All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: "David Kyle" <dsk6@pitt.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kylene Jo Hall <kjhall@us.ibm.com>,
	tpm@selhorst.net, tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 15:50:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070421155055.242d22dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <361d23520704201511j6d345d57u9f6dd6658c78d178@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 18:11:10 -0400 "David Kyle" <dsk6@pitt.edu> wrote:

> I've been working with the TPM driver, and I found that if I opened,
> used, then closed the TPM char device very frequently, I would get a
> kernel BUG message saying that the kernel tried to sleep while holding
> a spinlock.  I think I've isolated the problem to this function, in
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c:
> 
> int tpm_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> {
>         struct tpm_chip *chip = file->private_data;
>         spin_lock(&driver_lock);
>         file->private_data = NULL;
>         chip->num_opens--;
>         del_singleshot_timer_sync(&chip->user_read_timer);
>         flush_scheduled_work();
>         atomic_set(&chip->data_pending, 0);
>         put_device(chip->dev);
>         kfree(chip->data_buffer);
>         spin_unlock(&driver_lock);
>         return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tpm_release);
> 
> I believe that flush_scheduled_work can sleep, correct?  Does anyone
> know why this function is called while the spinlock is held?
> 

yup, that's a bug.  It's not immediately clear to e what driver_lock is
protecting.  Some global things, some per-device things, it appears.

A suitable fix might be to make driver_lock a mutex.

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-21 22:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-20 22:11 Sleep during spinlock in TPM driver David Kyle
2007-04-21 22:50 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-22 19:06 Parag Warudkar
2007-04-23  7:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2007-04-23 12:04   ` Parag Warudkar
2007-04-23 12:14     ` Parag Warudkar
2007-04-26  1:33       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-23 12:42     ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070421155055.242d22dc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dsk6@pitt.edu \
    --cc=kjhall@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tpm@selhorst.net \
    --cc=tpmdd-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.