From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965657AbXDWHgr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:36:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S965663AbXDWHgr (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:36:47 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:56982 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965657AbXDWHgq (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Apr 2007 03:36:46 -0400 Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 09:35:53 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Con Kolivas , Mike Galbraith , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Williams , Thomas Gleixner , caglar@pardus.org.tr, Willy Tarreau , Gene Heskett , Mark Lord , Ulrich Drepper Subject: Re: [patch] CFS scheduler, -v5 Message-ID: <20070423073553.GA19742@elte.hu> References: <20070420140457.GA14017@elte.hu> <20070423011229.GA20367@elte.hu> <20070423012509.GA25162@wotan.suse.de> <20070423025553.GA10407@elte.hu> <20070423032215.GC25162@wotan.suse.de> <20070423034310.GA19845@elte.hu> <20070423040600.GD25162@wotan.suse.de> <20070423071050.GD4518@elte.hu> <20070423072515.GA27012@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423072515.GA27012@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Nick Piggin wrote: > > do need reinforcement and test results on the basic part: _can_ this > > design be interactive enough on the desktop? So far the feedback has > > been affirmative, but more testing is needed. > > It seems to be fairly easy to make a scheduler interactive if the > timeslice is as low as that (not that I've released one for wider > testing, but just by my own observations). [...] ok, i'll bite: please release such a scheduler that does that with 5-8-10msec range timeslices :-) Ingo