From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Piggin Subject: Re: [patch 16/44] rd convert to new aops Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:20:42 +0200 Message-ID: <20070424112042.GC25413@wotan.suse.de> References: <20070424012346.696840000@suse.de> <20070424013434.737154000@suse.de> <20070424104647.GB13268@infradead.org> <20070424110549.GC32738@wotan.suse.de> <20070424111119.GA17085@infradead.org> <20070424111653.GB25413@wotan.suse.de> <20070424111811.GA18373@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux Filesystems , Mark Fasheh To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from ns2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:44471 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030965AbXDXLUn (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:20:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070424111811.GA18373@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 12:18:11PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 01:16:53PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > I was going to try doing that after this patchset. Or do you think it > > would be better to get the __grab_cache_page name right in the > > first place? > > If you plan to fix things up afterwards there's not point in doing > the renaming first. Would be nice to get both into the same release > in the end, though :) OK, will do.