From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: sysctls Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:50:18 -0700 Message-ID: <20070425145018.f373cc93.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070425122924.88391585.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070425195319.GA25080@hmsreliant.homelinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([65.172.181.25]:43398 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422768AbXDYVv2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 17:51:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070425195319.GA25080@hmsreliant.homelinux.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:53:19 -0400 Neil Horman wrote: > I did the optimistic dad sysctl, and have no strict use for numbered sysctls (I > was just unaware of the policy). I'll work up a patch to use > register_sysclt_table with CTL_UNNUMBERED in the next few days. I don't think you need to add a call to register_sysctl_table(), if that's what you're proposing. Just drop the changes to sysctl.h and use CTL_UNNUMBERED in sysctl.c.