From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992996AbXDYTpx (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:45:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S2992973AbXDYTpx (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:45:53 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:55203 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2993000AbXDYTpw (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:45:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 20:45:50 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Matthias Kaehlcke , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] use mutex instead of semaphore in tty_io.c Message-ID: <20070425194550.GA18914@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Matthias Kaehlcke , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20070425154934.GP6798@traven> <20070425191359.GA13241@infradead.org> <20070425194633.GA3280@traven> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425194633.GA3280@traven> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:46:33PM +0200, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > thanks for your remarks. is the following patch what you are > proposing? Yes, exactly. Looks good to me this way.:w