From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932184AbXDZLgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:36:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030668AbXDZLgy (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:36:54 -0400 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:33369 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932184AbXDZLgx (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Apr 2007 07:36:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:35:26 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Johannes Berg Cc: Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Con Kolivas , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: suspend2 merge (was Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: CFS and suspend2: hang in atomic copy) Message-ID: <20070426113525.GA1332@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Johannes Berg , Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , Nick Piggin , Mike Galbraith , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Con Kolivas , suspend2-devel@lists.suspend2.net, Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Arjan van de Ven References: <200704182245.24156.mail@earthworm.de> <20070418211632.GA7610@elte.hu> <200704182357.28107.mail@earthworm.de> <20070418220228.GA14536@elte.hu> <1176947576.5906.21.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> <20070419070437.GA25211@elte.hu> <20070424202336.GC16503@elf.ucw.cz> <20070424212408.GD16457@elf.ucw.cz> <1177582633.6814.29.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1177582633.6814.29.camel@johannes.berg> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:17:12PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Tue, 2007-04-24 at 23:24 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > I believe uswsusp user/kernel separation is clean enough. Kernel > > provides "snapshot image" and "resume image". (Thanks go to Rafael for > > very clean interface). > > The interface isn't even 64/32-bit compatible... It's not . And it's one of the worst interface I've seen lately. Did anyone actually review this crap before it went in? I completely agree with Linus that these kind of boundaries that lead to horribly complex ioctl interface are totally wrong. Now suspend2 wasn't exactly nice either when I last reviewed it, but we should probably give it another attempt if we can sort out a proper incremental merge.