From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Phil Oester <kernel@linuxace.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unspecified proto should print as "all" in iptables -L
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 10:13:17 -0700
Message-ID: <20070430171317.GA6904@linuxace.com>
References: <20070428220206.GA26272@linuxace.com>
	<463524E7.60107@netfilter.org>
	<Pine.LNX.4.61.0704301038100.22744@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Return-path: <netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0704301038100.22744@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </pipermail/netfilter-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.netfilter.org/mailman/listinfo/netfilter-devel>,
	<mailto:netfilter-devel-request@lists.netfilter.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org
List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hey btw, how would you go about matching protocol 0 since 0 is unfortunately
> defined as "all" in iptables?

I suppose you wouldn't, although AFAIK protocol 0 isn't actively
used.  Have you seen it used in the wild?

Phil