All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Bugla" <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
	helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-dvb@linuxtv.org
Subject: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:25:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070430172547.204810@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704301742390.2985@pentafluge.infradead.org>


-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:56:17 +0100 (BST)
Von: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>
An: Helge Hafting <helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no>
CC: Uwe Bugla <uwe.bugla@gmx.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities

> Hi Helge and others,
> 
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007, Helge Hafting wrote:
> 
> >> what the consequence is. To be truthful I would strategically prefare a
> >> vacuum at the price that the work isn't even done for months.
> >> ONLY IF there is a personnel vacuum the necessity for others to
> volunteer 
> >> will arise.
> >> 
> > A sufficiently bad maintainer will also do it.  If lots of submitters
> send
> > their patches to andrew in order to get past a dysfunctional maintainer,
> > then the subsystem effectively is unmaintained.
> 
> The point is that Uwe patch will generate regressions by breaking for 
> Twinhan. His patch just removes compilation for dst and dst_ca on Kconfig,
> without taking care or driver internals. So, two initialization functions 
> won't be called by symbol_request(). Although those two functions will be 
> undefined, as the dvb will do the linkedition at module runtume (if 
> DVB_ATTACH is selected), modprobe won't detect the lack of those
> functions.
> At the end, cards with ST chips (DST and/or DST CA) will stop working, 
> without even printing a warning.

Mister Chehab, for the first and for the utmost last time now:

My deselection patch implies a very good text to strongly discourage the use of DST
and DST_CA in case someone does not know what he or she is doing. In so far the case that "cards with ST chips (DST and/ or DST CA) will stop working" will not happen at all.
This patch IS NOT DONE TO MAKE ANY DST OR DST_CA MODULE REQUIRING CARD WORK - 
THIS IS YOUR PART OF SO-CALLED LOGIC!!!!

THIS PATCH IS DONE TO AVOID RAM WASTE FOR CASES IN WHICH IT IS PROVEN THAT DST AND DST_CA ARE NOT NEEDED AT ALL!!!!

Example: Pinnacle PCTV SAT!!!

And once again and for the last time:

I did not manage to at least find one single unresolved module during compilation, and I have been working with this almost fantastic solution with several kernels for months now!

Above that I gave you every proof one can ever give: You received dmesg, you received configs, you received proven thesis, you received everything.

It would really be a perfect solution to bomb away the almost incredible meters thick wall in front of your head and your eyes.

And at this time I will stop responding to your mails - I got enough of you!!!
It's enough!!
> 
> I've tried to explain this to Uwe several times, but, at the end, he 
> always start insulting me and/or other developers.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mauro.

Happy reflection, Mister Chehab!!!!!

-- 
"Feel free" - 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat ...
Jetzt GMX TopMail testen: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-30 17:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-29 18:22 Critical points about kernel 2.6.21 and pseudo-authorities Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 20:59   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-29 21:19     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-29 23:00       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30  0:58         ` [linux-dvb] " hermann pitton
2007-04-30 11:02           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 11:21             ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 11:50               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:04                 ` Helge Hafting
2007-04-30 15:24                   ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 16:09                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 16:56                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2007-04-30 17:25                     ` Uwe Bugla [this message]
2007-04-30 18:04                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 18:07                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:14                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-30 18:29                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 18:29                       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-04-30 19:42                         ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 11:35             ` Thomas Gleixner
2007-04-30 11:48             ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 12:37               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 13:06                 ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 14:09                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:30                     ` Michael Krufky
2007-04-30 16:39                       ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 14:49                 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 15:19                   ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 15:56                     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-04-30 22:41                       ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 22:58                         ` Manu Abraham
2007-04-30 23:08                           ` Markus Rechberger
2007-04-30 23:40                           ` Uwe Bugla
2007-05-01  0:19                             ` Manu Abraham
2007-05-01  0:29                               ` Markus Rechberger
2007-05-01  9:23                               ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:05                         ` Uwe Bugla
2007-04-30 23:20                           ` hermann pitton
2007-04-30  1:37   ` Trent Piepho
2007-04-30 10:47     ` Uwe Bugla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070430172547.204810@gmx.net \
    --to=uwe.bugla@gmx.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=helge.hafting@aitel.hist.no \
    --cc=linux-dvb@linuxtv.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@infradead.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.