From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: [PATCH] Unspecified proto should print as "all" in iptables -L Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:09:30 -0700 Message-ID: <20070430200930.GA8187@linuxace.com> References: <20070428220206.GA26272@linuxace.com> <463524E7.60107@netfilter.org> <20070430171317.GA6904@linuxace.com> <20070430173654.GB6904@linuxace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Jan Engelhardt , Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Jorge Davila Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 12:17:13PM -0600, Jorge Davila wrote: > I was trying to apply a rule > > iptables -p 0 -j DROP > > to block only the protocol 0. I know now why that rule was not working. > > I think that -p 0 must be a reference to the protocol 0 and not to all > protocols. > > Jorge. Which application uses protocol 0? Or is this a custom app you wrote? Phil