All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 21:51:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501015115.GJ26601@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <463698D5.20102@zytor.com>

On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:33:09PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
 > Hi all,
 > 
 > I'm rewriting the i386 setup code in C, instead of assembly, and before
 > I spend a very large amount of time translating all the various
 > card-specific probes, I want to ask the following question...
 > 
 > Does *anyone* care about these anymore?
 > 
 > All of these are specific to cards from a very long time ago.  I am
 > currently planning to retain the VESA-related code, and the standard
 > video modes, but I'd like to avoid the card-specific stuff, especially
 > since I have absolutely zero ability to test any of testing them (with
 > the possible sole exception of the cirrus5 code, which is emulated by qemu.)
 > 
 > Please holler if you care...

I don't really care, but I wonder what the point is of rewriting something
that hardly ever gets notably changed, and is rarely (if ever?) a source
of bugs.  It might be crufty old assembly, but it's worked well for years.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-05-01  1:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-01  1:33 arch/i386/boot rewrite, and all the hard-coded video cards H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  1:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-01  1:42   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02  7:46     ` Martin Mares
2007-05-02  9:22       ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-02 20:49         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-03  2:15         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 19:05       ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-05-01  1:51 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2007-05-01  2:17   ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  2:34     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  3:46       ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01  2:54         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  4:29           ` Andi Kleen
2007-05-01  3:38             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  3:06         ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  3:21           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  3:41             ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-05-01  3:44               ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  2:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-01  2:59   ` Dave Jones
2007-05-01 20:32   ` Rene Herman
2007-05-01 21:01     ` Rene Herman
2007-05-01 21:41     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-01 21:52       ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-14  4:51         ` Oleg Verych
2007-06-14  5:11           ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-06-14  7:18             ` Oleg Verych
2007-05-01 22:59       ` Rene Herman
2007-05-01 23:18       ` Antonino A. Daplas
2007-05-02 18:22       ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-02 20:59         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 21:07           ` Rene Herman
2007-05-02 21:15             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 21:20               ` Rene Herman
2007-05-02 21:25                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 21:39                   ` Rene Herman
2007-05-02 22:11                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 22:49                       ` Rene Herman
2007-05-02 22:59                         ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-02 23:18                           ` Rene Herman
2007-05-03  2:09                             ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-05-01  3:56 ` WANG Cong
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-01 22:41 Vlad
2007-05-01 23:22 ` Rene Herman
2007-05-02  1:10   ` Vlad
2007-05-02 18:25 ` Jan Engelhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070501015115.GJ26601@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.