From: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@oracle.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Bill Irwin <bill.irwin@oracle.com>, Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>,
Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com
Subject: Re: per-thread rusage
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 16:17:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070501231722.GV26598@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070502000458.2a7885d9@the-village.bc.nu>
At some point in the past, I wrote:
>> I just so happen to think we should implement a variety of CPU resource
>> limits beyond what we now do, so this, too, interests me.
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:04:58AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> Agreed - and make them all 64bit while doing the cleanup. One thing
> several Unixen have we don't for 32bi boxes is a proper set of 64bit
> resource handling for memory/file etc.
> We could also start using the CPU facilities to enforce some of
> the really interesting real time process ones (like main memory
> bandwidth) that at the moment we have no control over and can lead to
> very unfair behaviour.
That would be very useful, though I'm unsure of how broad a variety of
architectures implement performance counters useful for such. Simple
caps on %cpu would be a good start in my view.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-01 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 17:29 per-thread rusage William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-04 17:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2007-04-04 18:10 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-09 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 0:42 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 0:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-04-10 1:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-04-10 1:18 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-01 17:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 18:39 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 20:24 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 22:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:27 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-01 22:34 ` Bill Irwin
2007-05-01 23:04 ` Alan Cox
2007-05-01 23:17 ` Bill Irwin [this message]
2007-05-02 5:05 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-02 0:17 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-02 4:31 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-02 4:57 ` Ulrich Drepper
2007-05-01 22:29 ` Bill Irwin
2007-04-04 22:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-04-05 4:09 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-10 20:10 Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070501231722.GV26598@holomorphy.com \
--to=bill.irwin@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=drepper@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.