From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: "Paul Menage" <menage@google.com>
Cc: balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, xemul@sw.ru, dev@sw.ru,
rohitseth@google.com, pj@sgi.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
mbligh@google.com, containers@lists.osdl.org, serue@us.ibm.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
devel@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [PATCH 3/9] Containers (V9): Add tasks file interface
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 08:55:41 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070502032541.GA7311@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6599ad830705011337r6f200baen841919ac17c6f38b@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:37:24PM -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> > Any chance we could get a per-container task list? It will
> > help subsystem writers as well.
>
> It would be possible, yes - but we probably wouldn't want the overhead
> (additional ref counts and list manipulations on every fork/exit) of
> it on by default. We could make it a config option that particular
> subsystems could select.
>
> I guess the question is how useful is this really, compared to just
> doing a do_each_thread() and seeing which tasks are in the container?
> Certainly that's a non-trivial operation, but in what circumstances is
> it really necessary to do it?
For the CPU controller I was working on, (a fast access to) such a list would
have been valuable. Basically each task has a weight associated with it
(p->load_weight) which is made to depend upon its class limit. Whenever
the class limit changes, we need to go and change all its member task's
->load_weight value.
If you don't maintain the per-container task list, I guess I could still
work around it, by either:
- Walk the task table and find relevant members, OR better
perhaps
- Move p->load_weight to a class structure
--
Regards,
vatsa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 3:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-27 10:46 [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] Containers (V9): Basic container framework menage
2007-04-29 3:12 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Jackson
2007-05-01 17:40 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-01 17:46 ` Paul Menage
2007-05-01 18:40 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Jackson
2007-05-02 3:44 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-02 6:12 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-10 4:09 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-10 4:47 ` Paul Jackson
2007-05-10 4:49 ` Balbir Singh
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] Containers (V9): Example CPU accounting subsystem menage
2007-05-01 17:52 ` Balbir Singh
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] Containers (V9): Add tasks file interface menage
2007-05-01 18:12 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-01 20:37 ` [ckrm-tech] " Paul Menage
2007-05-02 3:25 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2007-05-02 3:25 ` Paul Menage
2007-05-02 3:46 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-08 14:51 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-10 21:21 ` Paul Menage
2007-05-11 2:31 ` Balbir Singh
2007-05-02 3:58 ` Balbir Singh
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] Containers (V9): Add fork/exit hooks menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] Containers (V9): Add container_clone() interface menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] Containers (V9): Add procfs interface menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] Containers (V9): Make cpusets a client of containers menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] Containers (V9): Share css_group arrays between tasks with same container memberships menage
2007-04-27 10:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] Containers (V9): Simple debug info subsystem menage
2007-04-29 1:47 ` [PATCH 0/9] Containers (V9): Generic Process Containers Paul Jackson
2007-04-29 9:37 ` Paul Jackson
2007-04-30 17:12 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-30 17:09 ` Paul Menage
2007-04-30 18:06 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-04-30 17:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-30 18:16 ` [ckrm-tech] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070502032541.GA7311@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=balbir@in.ibm.com \
--cc=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=containers@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@google.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=rohitseth@google.com \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=xemul@sw.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.