Re: paravirt_ops queue rebased

[Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>]

On Sunday 06 May 2007 19:21:17 Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I just rebased my paravirt_ops patch queue to current git.  Looks like
> almost all the pre-req patches are now in, which is nice.
> 
> The only missing thing from your patches was you sched_clock patches and
> the sched_clock paravirt-op.  Are there still problems with either your
> sched_clock patch

There were problems with my patch and yours dependend on it so I deferred both.

> or the paravirt patch?  Should I resubmit the 
> paravirt-sched_clock patch based on git?

Not needed, I still have it.
 
> The only other general patches before the Xen series I have left in my
> queue are:
> 
>     i386-common-smp.patch
>     i386-fix-voyager-build.patch
>     vsyscall-note-use-elfnote_h.patch
> 
> I obviously don't depend the voyager patch, but I tweaked it a bit to
> apply to the current git tree.
> 
> How is your patch queue looking now?  Is there much left?

Only a few patches left, like unwinder, vDSO, sched-clock. 

-Andi