From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966345AbXEGTgQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 15:36:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S966299AbXEGTgN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 15:36:13 -0400 Received: from pasmtpa.tele.dk ([80.160.77.114]:44923 "EHLO pasmtpA.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966259AbXEGTgN (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 May 2007 15:36:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:37:07 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Roman Zippel Cc: LKML , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: kconfig: error out if recursive dependencies are found Message-ID: <20070507193707.GA19985@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20070502201741.GD9044@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20070506073615.GA6492@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20070506074038.GB6492@uranus.ravnborg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 02:38:36AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, 6 May 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > if (sym->flags & SYMBOL_CHECK) { > > - printf("Warning! Found recursive dependency: %s", sym->name); > > + fprintf(stderr, "%s:%d:error: found recursive dependency: %s", > > + sym->prop->file->name, sym->prop->lineno, sym->name); > > return sym; > > } > > If it were that simple to print the location, I had done it already. :) > Try this: > > config FOO > bool > select BAR > depends on BAR > > config BAR > bool > > I looked into this before, for simple properties one could just remember > the last checked property via a static variable. The problem are the > selects which are checked before that loop, here the information from > where they were selected is not available anymore (at least not easily). We need to point out _one_ of the faulty spots only. But I see that kconfig records file:line for properties and menu entries but not for symbols. Any special reason why file:line is omitted for symbols (except size of allocated memory)? Without looking into details it looks more relevant to have file:line for symbols rather than for prompts / properties.. Sam