From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl8um-0000hW-7a for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:30:32 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl8uk-0000h8-RI for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:30:30 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl8ui-0000ef-Vh for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:30:30 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl8ui-0000ec-R4 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:30:28 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl8ni-0004mr-38 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 15:23:14 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C713D155F2D for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 01:23:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9356A3D155F2C for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 01:23:21 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 21:23:08 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070507082135.GA8703@aragorn> In-Reply-To: <20070507082135.GA8703@aragorn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705072123.08398.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000135, version=0.17.2 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Subject: Re: grub-probe without arguments X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 19:30:31 -0000 On Monday 07 May 2007 10:21, Robert Millan wrote: > I think it would be reasonable to allow grub-probe to work without > arguments. Any comments? Why do you think so? If you want to omit the argument, I think the Unix way is to default to current dir. Okuji