From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [202.173.155.195] (helo=birgitte.twibble.org) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1HlEPq-0003JD-2D for openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 03:23:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A07310CA89; Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:30 +1000 (EST) Received: from birgitte.twibble.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (birgitte [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21647-08; Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:28 +1000 (EST) Received: from nynaeve.twibble.org (nynaeve.twibble.org [202.173.155.194]) by birgitte.twibble.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CD1B90D3; Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:28 +1000 (EST) Received: by nynaeve.twibble.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id D9A22B70149; Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:28 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 11:22:28 +1000 From: Jamie Lenehan To: Rolf Leggewie Message-ID: <20070508012228.GA13161@twibble.org> References: <20070427105722.GA4340@twibble.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd at twibble.org Cc: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: perl 5.8.8 is ready X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 01:23:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:38:49PM +0200, Rolf Leggewie wrote: > Perl has been recently broken for > > a) MACHINE="qemuarm" on angstrom > b) MACHINE="collie" on sharprom-compatible (worked two days prior) A log or something about what was going wrong might have helped ;) Looking at irc logs it looks like you having problems with the patching failing which it doesn't seem to do for anyone else. My first suspect would be that you added the patch in question (letgcc-find-errno.patch) locally to test it (when I added it to bugzilla) and left it in there. Then a recent mt update has resulted in the change I pushed being included resulting in the patch being applied twice in the perl recipe. So can you do an mtn diff on perl_5.8.8.bb and make sure this isn't the problem? If it isn't the problem I might need some more information (although I can't really thing of what else this could be and/or what would help figuring it out at the moment.) -- Jamie Lenehan