From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: jura@netams.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org,
greearb@candelatech.com, mostrows@speakeasy.net
Subject: [PATCH (take 2)] vlan: lockdep class for ppp _xmit_lock Re: ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning
Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 15:13:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070509131337.GA3177@ff.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070509.023224.31601789.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 02:32:24AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
> Date: Wed, 9 May 2007 11:35:37 +0200
>
> > After rethinking there is the 3-rd way (as usual):
> >
> > c) vlan should use different lockdep lock subclasses or
> > classes for different types of devices, used at the same
> > time.
>
> Perhaps we should just bite the bullet and use a seperate
> unique lock class for ->_xmit_lock of each device type.
>
> We are going to find more cases like this one, for sure.
>
Theoretically subclasses are intended for this, and there
are 6 free places still. Practically lockdep treats subclasses
differently sometimes (e.g., now, it seems, it cannot see a real
recursion error inside a subclass). So, it's mainly a problem
of some static memory wasting or saving (unless it should be
subclassed yet - then no question).
Here is "your way" alternative, preferred version - I hope Yuriy
isn't bored with this testing yet!
Of course, I see nothing against you or somebody else doing
or re-doing this all as needed.
Regards,
Jarek P.
---> (take 2)
This patch's aim is to let lockdep see ppp devs as different
from others (default), and it's OK to take: _xmit_lock of vlan
and _xmit_lock of ppp with reverse order provided vlan _xmit_locks
are bound to different devs (ppp and e.g. eth).
> =======================================================
> [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> 2.6.21-rc6-mm1 #4
> -------------------------------------------------------
> pppd/14305 is trying to acquire lock:
> (&vlan_netdev_xmit_lock_key){-...}, at: [<ffffffff8022f90b>]
> dev_queue_xmit+0x26b/0x300
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> (&pch->downl#2){-+..}, at: [<ffffffff80388d3c>] ppp_push+0x5f/0xa7
>
> which lock already depends on the new lock.
The final idea to use separate classes by David Miller.
Reported & tested by: "Yuriy N. Shkandybin" <jura@netams.com>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Michal Ostrowski <mostrows@speakeasy.net>
Signed-off-by: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
---
diff -Nurp 2.6.21-git7-/net/8021q/vlan.c 2.6.21/net/8021q/vlan.c
--- 2.6.21-git7-/net/8021q/vlan.c 2007-05-01 12:43:39.000000000 +0200
+++ 2.6.21/net/8021q/vlan.c 2007-05-09 14:46:12.000000000 +0200
@@ -376,6 +376,8 @@ static void vlan_transfer_operstate(cons
*/
static struct lock_class_key vlan_netdev_xmit_lock_key;
+/* pppoe uses two different kinds of _xmit_lock for ppp & eth */
+static struct lock_class_key vlan_ppp_xmit_lock_key;
/* Attach a VLAN device to a mac address (ie Ethernet Card).
* Returns the device that was created, or NULL if there was
@@ -535,7 +537,12 @@ static struct net_device *register_vlan_
if (register_netdevice(new_dev))
goto out_free_newdev;
- lockdep_set_class(&new_dev->_xmit_lock, &vlan_netdev_xmit_lock_key);
+ if (unlikely(real_dev->type == ARPHRD_PPP))
+ lockdep_set_class(&new_dev->_xmit_lock,
+ &vlan_ppp_xmit_lock_key);
+ else
+ lockdep_set_class(&new_dev->_xmit_lock,
+ &vlan_netdev_xmit_lock_key);
new_dev->iflink = real_dev->ifindex;
vlan_transfer_operstate(real_dev, new_dev);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-09 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-26 7:27 [patch 10/15] ppp_generic: fix lockdep warning akpm
2007-04-26 8:39 ` David Miller
2007-04-26 10:49 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-09 9:35 ` [PATCH] vlan: lockdep subclass for ppp _xmit_lock " Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-09 9:32 ` David Miller
2007-05-09 13:13 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2007-05-09 20:06 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-05-10 5:30 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-10 6:03 ` Yuriy N. Shkandybin
2007-05-10 6:39 ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-05-11 7:00 ` [PATCH] ppp_generic: lockdep class " Jarek Poplawski
2007-04-26 10:04 ` [patch 10/15] " Paul Mackerras
2007-04-26 11:28 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070509131337.GA3177@ff.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@o2.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=jura@netams.com \
--cc=mostrows@speakeasy.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.