From: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode
Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 13:25:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705101325.40455.sr@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200705101104.43753.repvik@kynisk.com>
On Thursday 10 May 2007, ?yvind Repvik wrote:
> > And furthermore, it would be very desireable to drop the current NPE
> > U-Boot ethernet driver implementation based on the original Intel code
> > with the complex and ugly Intel access library completely, and
> > re-implement the driver based on the new Linux IXP4xx NPE ethernet
> > drivers. There are currently 2 completely new drivers without the Intel
> > access library which will result in lower memory footprint and much less
> > and cleaner code.
>
> That would be Christian Hohnstaedt <chohnstaedt@innominate.com>'s driver
> which is (afaik) in mainstream by now, and
> Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>'s driver, which is newer. There's a
> discussion about these drivers on linux-arm-kernel.
Yes, but IIRC the one from Christian never made it into mainstream. And the
new one from Krzysztof seems to get quite good reactions.
> Getting either of those drivers fixed up and pushed to u-boot would be
> great.
Yes, both would be way better than the current implementation. Hopefully one
of those drivers will make in into mainline and this should be the one to
pick then.
> Of course, one will still need to put the microcode somewhere else
> due to licencing, but that's a minor matter.
Yes, just a minor issue from the code point of view, but a big issue from the
licensing point of view.
Best regards,
Stefan
=====================================================================
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
=====================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-10 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 4:39 [U-Boot-Users] U-boot & MonteJade start up Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-02 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-02 6:22 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 7:17 ` [U-Boot-Users] IXP425 ethernet & NPE microcode Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 9:16 ` Eric BENARD
2007-05-09 9:52 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-09 20:32 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 22:37 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-09 22:55 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-09 23:16 ` David Hawkins
2007-05-10 1:50 ` Jonathan Pratt
2007-05-10 5:16 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-10 9:04 ` Øyvind Repvik
2007-05-10 11:25 ` Stefan Roese [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-10 13:08 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 17:53 ` Stefan Roese
2007-05-10 13:46 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-10 16:39 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-05-11 7:05 Martijn de Gouw
2007-05-11 8:00 ` Stefan Roese
[not found] <4CD35CD1F8085945B597F80EEC8942135FA60A@exc01.bk.prodrive.nl>
2007-06-06 12:21 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705101325.40455.sr@denx.de \
--to=sr@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.