All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: jeff@garzik.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:52:17 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070511005217.GA23186@linux-sh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4643196B.7070806@gmail.com>

On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 03:08:59PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Paul Mundt wrote:
> > The detection is simply flaky after that point, however before the
> > current master it never hit the 35 second point (and thus never implied
> > that the link was down). I'll double check the bisect log to see if there
> > was anything beyond that that may have caused it.
> > 
> > The -ENODEV at least implies that the SRST fails, so at least that's a
> > starting point.
> 
> If prereset() fails to get the initial DRDY before 10secs, it assumes
> something went wrong and escalates to hardreset.  sil family of
> controllers report 0xff status while the link is broken and it seems
> that your particular drive needs more than the current 150ms to recover
> phy link.  It probably went unnoticed till now because the device was
> never hardreset before.  If the diagnosis is correct, increasing the
> delay in hardreset should fix the problem.  Well, let's see.  :-)
> 
Bumping the hardreset delay up does indeed fix it, I've had to bump it up
to 1200 before it started working (at 600 it still fails):

[    0.967379] scsi0 : sata_sil
[    0.970425] scsi1 : sata_sil
[    0.973298] ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xfd000280 ctl 0xfd00028a bmdma 0xfd000200 irq 0
[    0.981331] ata2: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xfd0002c0 ctl 0xfd0002ca bmdma 0xfd000208 irq 0
[    1.299353] ata1: device not ready (errno=-19), forcing hardreset
[    2.817893] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
[    2.826284] ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 39070080, hpa_sectors = 39070080
[    2.831052] ata1.00: ATA-5: HHD424020F7SV00, 00MLA0A5, max UDMA/100
[    2.837548] ata1.00: 39070080 sectors, multi 0: LBA
[    2.842702] ata1.00: applying bridge limits
[    2.854162] ata1.00: ata_hpa_resize 1: sectors = 39070080, hpa_sectors = 39070080
[    2.858938] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
[    3.172602] ata2: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 310)
[    3.175736] scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Access     ATA      HHD424020F7SV00  00ML PQ: 0 ANSI: 5

I'm not sure if it matters or not, but this is an iVDR drive, so that
might also have additional implications.

--

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 4595d1f..4dad3fd 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -3518,7 +3518,7 @@ int sata_std_hardreset(struct ata_port *ap, unsigned int *class,
 	}
 
 	/* wait a while before checking status, see SRST for more info */
-	msleep(150);
+	msleep(1200);
 
 	rc = ata_wait_ready(ap, deadline);
 	/* link occupied, -ENODEV too is an error */

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-11  0:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-10  7:20 libata reset-seq merge broke sata_sil on sh Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 11:28 ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 11:53   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-10 12:46   ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-10 13:08     ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-11  0:52       ` Paul Mundt [this message]
2007-05-11  9:39         ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-12  3:49           ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16  0:30             ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-16 16:44               ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Tejun Heo
2007-05-17  0:50                 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-17  0:59                 ` Paul Mundt
2007-05-19 15:54                 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 15:54                   ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:23                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:54                     ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20  9:50                       ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 13:26                         ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:09                           ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:35                             ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 16:39                 ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 16:39                   ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 18:43                   ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 19:04                     ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-19 22:33                       ` sd_resume redundant? [was: [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset()] Indan Zupancic
2007-05-19 22:33                         ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20  9:54                         ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 14:27                           ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-20 17:17                             ` Tejun Heo
2007-05-20 19:47                               ` Indan Zupancic
2007-05-21  6:02                       ` [PATCH] libata: implement ata_wait_after_reset() Paul Mundt
2007-05-29  1:31                 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-05-29  7:33                   ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070511005217.GA23186@linux-sh.org \
    --to=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.