From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HmHKS-0006o1-1l for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 10 May 2007 18:41:45 -0400 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m2so530399uge for ; Thu, 10 May 2007 15:41:42 -0700 (PDT) From: borasah@gmail.com To: tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: NAND flash write goes wrong Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 01:42:05 +0300 References: <200705102150.31171.borasah@gmail.com> <200705110037.08480.borasah@gmail.com> <1178835314.22481.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <1178835314.22481.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705110142.05663.borasah@gmail.com> Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 00:37 +0300, borasah@gmail.com wrote: > > jffs2: Erase block size too small (16KiB). Using virtual blocks size > > (32KiB) > > ---------------------------------------------------^^^^^^^ > > The virtual block support was removed two years ago. Oops... > Please use an up to date kernel. > http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/source.html#kernelversions I am using 2.6.11. Is this valid for it? Or I can use older mtd-utils? -- Bora SAHIN