From: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Subject: [PATCH] Updated documentation of hooks in git-receive-pack.
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 19:11:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070512171113.GA8100@efreet.light.src> (raw)
Added documentation of pre-receive and post-receive hooks and updated
documentation of update and post-update hooks.
Signed-off-by: Jan Hudec <bulb@ucw.cz>
---
Recent question on the mailing-list made me to look at the post-receive hook
in the Documentation/hooks.txt, only to find it is not mentioned there at
all.
I looked up all the hooks and how they are called in receive-pack.c and
updated the documentation for them. Please review and apply.
Feel free to suggest syntactic or semantic fixes; I am not a native English
speaker, so there may well be some.
Regards,
Jan
Documentation/hooks.txt | 84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/hooks.txt b/Documentation/hooks.txt
index b083290..e36cf44 100644
--- a/Documentation/hooks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/hooks.txt
@@ -90,6 +90,37 @@ parameter, and is invoked after a commit is made.
This hook is meant primarily for notification, and cannot affect
the outcome of `git-commit`.
+[[pre-receive]]
+pre-receive
+-----------
+
+This hook is invoked by `git-receive-pack` on the remote repository,
+which happens when a `git push` is done on a local repository.
+Just before starting to update refs on the remote repository, the
+pre-receive hook is invoked. Its exit status determines the success
+or failure of the update.
+
+This hook executes once for the receive operation. It takes no
+arguments, but for each ref to be updated it receives on standard
+input a line of the format:
+
+ <old-value> SP <new-value> SP <ref-name> NL
+
+where `<old-value>` is the old object name stored in the ref,
+`<new-value>` is the new object name to be stored in the ref and
+`<ref-name>` is the full name of the ref.
+
+If the hook exits with non-zero status, none of the refs will be
+updated. If the hook returs zero, updating of individual refs can
+still be prevented by the <<update,'update'>> hook.
+
+The standard output of this hook is sent to `stderr`, so if you
+want to report something to the `git-send-pack` on the other end,
+you can simply `echo` your messages.
+
+There is no default 'pre-receive' hook.
+
+[[update]]
update
------
@@ -108,7 +139,7 @@ three parameters:
A zero exit from the update hook allows the ref to be updated.
Exiting with a non-zero status prevents `git-receive-pack`
-from updating the ref.
+from updating that ref.
This hook can be used to prevent 'forced' update on certain refs by
making sure that the object name is a commit object that is a
@@ -117,7 +148,8 @@ That is, to enforce a "fast forward only" policy.
It could also be used to log the old..new status. However, it
does not know the entire set of branches, so it would end up
-firing one e-mail per ref when used naively, though.
+firing one e-mail per ref when used naively, though. The
+<<post-receive,'post-receive'>> hook is more suited to that.
Another use suggested on the mailing list is to use this hook to
implement access control which is finer grained than the one
@@ -127,9 +159,45 @@ The standard output of this hook is sent to `stderr`, so if you
want to report something to the `git-send-pack` on the other end,
you can simply `echo` your messages.
-The default 'update' hook, when enabled, demonstrates how to
-send out a notification e-mail.
+The default 'update' hook, when enabled--and with
+`hooks.allowunannotated` config option turned on--prevents
+unannotated tags to be pushed.
+[[post-receive]]
+post-receive
+------------
+
+This hook is invoked by `git-receive-pack` on the remote repository,
+which happens when a `git push` is done on a local repository.
+It executes on the remote repository once after all the refs have
+been updated.
+
+This hook executes once for the receive operation. It takes no
+arguments, but for each ref that was updated it receives on standard
+input a line of the format:
+
+ <old-value> SP <new-value> SP <ref-name> NL
+
+on stdin, where `<old-value>` is the old object name stored in the
+ref, `<new-value>` is the new object name to be stored in the ref and
+`<ref-name>` is the full name of the ref.
+
+This hook cannot affect the outcome of `git-receive-pack`, as it's
+called after the real work is done.
+
+This superceedes the [[post-update]] hook in that it actually get's
+both old and new values of all the refs.
+
+The standard output of this hook is sent to `stderr`, so if you
+want to report something to the `git-send-pack` on the other end,
+you can simply `echo` your messages.
+
+The default 'post-receive' hook is empty, but there is
+a script `post-receive-email` provided in the `contrib/hooks`
+directory in git distribution, which implements sending commit
+emails.
+
+[[post-update]]
post-update
-----------
@@ -146,7 +214,8 @@ the outcome of `git-receive-pack`.
The 'post-update' hook can tell what are the heads that were pushed,
but it does not know what their original and updated values are,
-so it is a poor place to do log old..new.
+so it is a poor place to do log old..new. See
+<<post-receive,'post-receive'>> hook above for a better one.
When enabled, the default 'post-update' hook runs
`git-update-server-info` to keep the information used by dumb
@@ -154,6 +223,5 @@ transports (e.g., HTTP) up-to-date. If you are publishing
a git repository that is accessible via HTTP, you should
probably enable this hook.
-The standard output of this hook is sent to `/dev/null`; if you
-want to report something to the `git-send-pack` on the other end,
-you can redirect your output to your `stderr`.
+Both standard output and standard error output are forwarded to
+`git-send-pack` on the other end.
--
1.5.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-12 17:11 Jan Hudec [this message]
2007-05-12 19:27 ` [PATCH] Updated documentation of hooks in git-receive-pack Junio C Hamano
2007-05-12 20:13 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-12 20:29 ` Jan Hudec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070512171113.GA8100@efreet.light.src \
--to=bulb@ucw.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=junkio@cox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.