From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] x86_64: use signalfd and timerfd compat syscalls
Date: Sat, 12 May 2007 17:18:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705121718.31467.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070511230406.GE8644@osiris.ibm.com>
On Saturday 12 May 2007 01:04:06 Heiko Carstens wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
>
> Looks like these two are wired up in a wrong way.
Thanks for spotting. I think it would have been ok for signalfd
because sigset_t should be the same size, but it's clearly broken
for timerfd
-Andi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-12 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-11 23:04 [patch] x86_64: use signalfd and timerfd compat syscalls Heiko Carstens
2007-05-12 15:18 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705121718.31467.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.