All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>,
	efault@gmx.de, tingy@cs.umass.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fair clock use in CFS
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 12:31:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070514103120.GA23766@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514102929.GL31925@holomorphy.com>


* William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com> wrote:

> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 02:03:58PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > 	I have been brooding over how fair clock is computed/used in
> > CFS and thought I would ask the experts to avoid wrong guesses!
> > As I understand, fair_clock is a monotonously increasing clock which
> > advances at a pace inversely proportional to the load on the runqueue.
> > If load = 1 (task), it will advance at same pace as wall clock, as 
> > load increases it advances slower than wall clock.
> > In addition, following calculations depend on fair clock: task's wait
> > time on runqueue and sleep time outside the runqueue (both reflected in
> > p->wait_run_time).
> 
> It's not hard to see that that's a mistake. [...]

please clarify - exactly what is a mistake? Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-14 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-14  8:33 fair clock use in CFS Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-14 10:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-14 10:31   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2007-05-14 11:05     ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-14 11:22       ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-14 11:20         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-14 12:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-14 23:57             ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-14 20:20           ` Ting Yang
2007-05-14 11:50       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-14 14:31         ` Daniel Hazelton
2007-05-14 15:02           ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-14 15:08           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-15  2:59           ` David Schwartz
2007-05-14 21:24         ` Ting Yang
2007-05-15  0:57           ` Ting Yang
2007-05-14 23:23         ` William Lee Irwin III
2007-05-14 11:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-14 13:04   ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2007-05-14 13:15     ` Ingo Molnar
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-05-14 15:02 Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070514103120.GA23766@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tingy@cs.umass.edu \
    --cc=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.