From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Rewrite IO allocation & mapping on powerpc64
Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 16:37:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200705141637.19572.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070514075415.7999BDDEC8@ozlabs.org>
On Monday 14 May 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> + * Define the address ranges for MMIO and IO space :
> + *
> + * ISA_IO_BASE = VMALLOC_END, 64K reserved area
> + * PHB_IO_BASE = ISA_IO_BASE + 64K to ISA_IO_BASE + 2G, PHB IO spaces
> + * IOREMAP_BASE = ISA_IO_BASE + 2G to VMALLOC_START + PGTABLE_RANGE
> + */
> +#define ISA_IO_BASE (VMALLOC_END)
> +#define ISA_IO_END (VMALLOC_END + 0x10000ul)
> +#define PHB_IO_BASE (ISA_IO_END)
> +#define PHB_IO_END (VMALLOC_END + 0x80000000ul)
> +#define IOREMAP_BASE (PHB_IO_END)
> +#define IOREMAP_END (VMALLOC_START + PGTABLE_RANGE)
Very nice layout, it suddenly all makes sense ;-)
PHB_IO_END should probably be
#define PHB_IO_END (VMALLOC_END + PIO_RESERVED)
At least, that is how I understand the definition of PIO_RESERVED.
Do you think it's ok to not treat the range between 64k and 1M special?
There might be ISA drivers that expect devices in there. Maybe we should
start PHB_IO_BASE after a 1M guard area where nothing is mapped.
Where should Olof's PCMCIA space go? The ISA or the PHB range?
> Index: linux-cell/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-cell.orig/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile 2007-05-10 13:21:02.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-cell/arch/powerpc/kernel/Makefile 2007-05-14 16:43:03.000000000 +1000
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_UDBG_16550) += legacy_s
> module-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += module_64.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += $(module-y)
>
> -pci64-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += pci_64.o pci_dn.o
> +pci64-$(CONFIG_PPC64) += pci_64.o pci_dn.o isa-bridge.o
> pci32-$(CONFIG_PPC32) := pci_32.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += $(pci64-y) $(pci32-y)
> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_MSI) += msi.o
Can we make this depend on CONFIG_ISA? Most platforms don't actually want
to build in ISA support.
> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
> * 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> */
>
> -#undef DEBUG
> +#define DEBUG
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
needs to get reverted of course
> /* pci_io_base -- the base address from which io bars are offsets.
> * This is the lowest I/O base address (so bar values are always positive),
> * and it *must* be the start of ISA space if an ISA bus exists because
> - * ISA drivers use hard coded offsets. If no ISA bus exists a dummy
> - * page is mapped and isa_io_limit prevents access to it.
> + * ISA drivers use hard coded offsets.
> */
> -unsigned long isa_io_base; /* NULL if no ISA bus */
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(isa_io_base);
> -unsigned long pci_io_base;
> +unsigned long pci_io_base = ISA_IO_BASE;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_io_base);
>
> void iSeries_pcibios_init(void);
Why do we even need to make pci_io_base a variable? There are not many
places where it's used, and they are are read-only. Replacing it with the
constant of ISA_IO_BASE should reduce the code size in every driver
that uses port access functions.
Arnd <><
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-14 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-14 7:53 [RFC/PATCH] powerpc: Rewrite IO allocation & mapping on powerpc64 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 7:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 8:03 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 9:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 13:50 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-14 20:53 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-15 0:17 ` Paul Mackerras
2007-05-15 4:33 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-15 6:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2007-05-14 15:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2007-05-14 23:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-15 0:05 ` Olof Johansson
2007-05-14 20:59 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-14 23:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-15 0:06 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-05-15 10:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-15 20:42 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200705141637.19572.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=anton@samba.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.