From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho3gT-0001BG-Mg for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:31:49 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho3gS-0001B2-27 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:31:48 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho3gP-0001Aq-Oa for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:31:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ho3gP-0001An-JH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:31:45 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ho3YU-0000My-PH for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 May 2007 16:23:34 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CF53D19A101 for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 02:27:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1E43D19A0FF for ; Wed, 16 May 2007 02:27:15 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 22:23:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070511155339.85f69598.jonny@csc.jp> <464485FB.2090406@nic.fi> <20070512230026.GA25257@aragorn> In-Reply-To: <20070512230026.GA25257@aragorn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705152223.33441.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.17.2 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Subject: Re: gfxterm and vesa X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 20:31:48 -0000 On Sunday 13 May 2007 01:00, Robert Millan wrote: > Which do you think should be the default (at least in the short term)? 640x480 or 640x400. 800x600 is broadly supported nowadays, but 640x4?0 is still safer. Okuji