From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aron Griffis Subject: Re: rationale behind pygrub with TERM=vt100 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 01:03:46 -0400 Message-ID: <20070516050345.GA20172@fc.hp.com> References: <20070515005953.GB17337@fc.hp.com> <1179209178.8038.27.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1179209178.8038.27.camel@cthulhu.hellion.org.uk> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Ian Campbell Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Ian Campbell wrote: [Tue May 15 2007, 02:06:18AM EDT] > I think it's because of cset 13540:5f998c3170f7 (Plumb bootloader > I/O through xenconsole) which meant that there was no sane $TERM to > be passed into pygrub anymore since you can't know the $TERM of the > eventual xenconsole client. vt100 is a good low common denominator. Thanks, that's helpful. I missed the connection between those changesets... Aron