From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoFB8-0004LL-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 04:48:15 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HoFB6-0004KK-DZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 04:48:13 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HoFB6-0004KH-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 04:48:12 -0400 Received: from phoenix.bawue.net ([193.7.176.60] helo=mail.bawue.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HoF36-0006ed-Gr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 04:39:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 09:38:04 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, MIPS64] dmult & dmultu emulation Message-ID: <20070516083804.GB22169@networkno.de> References: <20070516000014.GA6169@amd64.aurel32.net> <74FC5FD4-034C-11DC-8C22-0005025B95B5@hotmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <74FC5FD4-034C-11DC-8C22-0005025B95B5@hotmail.com> From: Thiemo Seufer Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "C.W. Betts" Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org C.W. Betts wrote: > Would this patch work with other 64-bit processors, or is it > x86-64-only? I'm mainly thinking about 64-bit PowerPCs, but I don't > know if PowerPCs uses the same method. You may have missed the x86-64 specific assembly code in there. Thiemo