From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1HoHmU-0003qY-VQ for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Message-ID: <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Jörn Engel wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > "JFFS2"? ;) JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash filesystem.... ;-) -- Jamie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759276AbXEPLfw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756374AbXEPLfo (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:44 -0400 Received: from mail.shareable.org ([81.29.64.88]:35930 "EHLO mail.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755414AbXEPLfn (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:43 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 934 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 16 May 2007 07:35:42 EDT Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: David Woodhouse , akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Message-ID: <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jörn Engel wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > "JFFS2"? ;) JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash filesystem.... ;-) -- Jamie From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 12:34:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20070516113434.GC20482@mail.shareable.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <17994.1241.436841.681216@stoffel.org> <20070515191926.GB1220@lazybastard.org> <1179291255.2859.195.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: akpm@osdl.org, Evgeniy Polyakov , Albert Cahalan , Greg KH , John Stoffel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Oeser , Pekka Enberg , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Jan Engelhardt , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , David Woodhouse To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070516110933.GA5472@lazybastard.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-mtd-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org+gldm-linux-mtd-36=gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org J=F6rn Engel wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 12:54:14 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: > > Personally I'd just go for 'JFFS3'. After all, it has a better claim to > > the name than either of its predecessors :) > = > Did you ever see akpm's facial expression when he tried to pronounce > "JFFS2"? ;) JFFS3 is a good, meaningful name to anyone familiar with JFFS2. But if akpm can't pronounce it, how about FFFS for faster flash filesystem.... ;-) -- Jamie ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/