From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, hugh@veritas.com, Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
Subject: Re: Fix page allocation flags in grow_dev_page()
Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 13:34:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070516133416.9d730d08.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705152111380.5192@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
On Tue, 15 May 2007 21:12:41 -0700 (PDT)
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> Grow dev page simply passes GFP_NOFS to find_or_create_page. This means the
> allocation of radix tree nodes is done with GFP_NOFS and the allocation
> of a new page is done using GFP_NOFS.
>
> The mapping has a flags field that contains the necessary allocation flags for
> the page cache allocation. These need to be consulted in order to get DMA
> and HIGHMEM allocations etc right. And yes a blockdev could be allowing
> Highmem allocations if its a ramdisk.
>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
>
> ---
> fs/buffer.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: vps/fs/buffer.c
> ===================================================================
> --- vps.orig/fs/buffer.c 2007-05-15 15:47:32.000000000 -0700
> +++ vps/fs/buffer.c 2007-05-15 15:48:36.000000000 -0700
> @@ -981,7 +981,8 @@ grow_dev_page(struct block_device *bdev,
> struct page *page;
> struct buffer_head *bh;
>
> - page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index, GFP_NOFS);
> + page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
> + mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS);
> if (!page)
> return NULL;
>
erk. When I fixed this up against Mel's stuff I ended up with:
page = find_or_create_page(inode->i_mapping, index,
(mapping_gfp_mask(inode->i_mapping) & ~__GFP_FS) |
__GFP_RECLAIMABLE);
which led to zillions of these:
static inline int allocflags_to_migratetype(gfp_t gfp_flags)
{
WARN_ON((gfp_flags & GFP_MOVABLE_MASK) == GFP_MOVABLE_MASK);
so I assume that mapping_gfp_mask() already had __GFP_MOVABLE set.
So... which is it to be?
<looks at the comments>
#define __GFP_RECLAIMABLE ((__force gfp_t)0x80000u) /* Page is reclaimable */
#define __GFP_MOVABLE ((__force gfp_t)0x100000u) /* Page is movable */
well these pages are both reclaimable and moveable. Sigh.
I'll just remove the __GFP_RECLAIMABLE from the above, see what that does.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-16 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-16 4:12 Fix page allocation flags in grow_dev_page() Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 20:34 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-05-16 20:42 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-05-16 21:48 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070516133416.9d730d08.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.