All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Smart fetch via HTTP?
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 14:56:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070518215607.GT24644@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.98.0705181312060.3890@woody.linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:13:36PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> If it's _just_ the initial GET/CONNECT strings, yeah, we could probably 
> easily make the git-daemon just ignore them. That shouldn't be a problem.
> 
> But if there's anything *else* required, it gets uglier much more quickly.

	With CONNECT, there isn't anything.  That is, your
GIT_PROXY_COMMAND handles talking to the proxy, then gives git itself a
raw data pipe.  My proxy allows CONNECT to 9418, and that's how I use it
today.
	If you tried to make POST work (It'd be POST, not GET, as you
need to connect up the sending side), either apache would have to front
it for us, or "git-daemon --http" would have to accept the HTTP headers
on before the input, and output a proper HTTP response before sending
output.  Seeing the headers would allow for us to vhost, even.
	Hmm, but the proxy may not allow two-way communication.  Does
the git protocol have more than one round-trip?  That is:

Client:
    POST http://server.git.host:80/projects/thisproject HTTP/1.1
    Host: server.git.host

    fetch-pack <sha1>
    EOF

Server:
    200 OK HTTP/1.1
    
    <data>
    EOF

should work, I'd think.

Joel


-- 

"Ninety feet between bases is perhaps as close as man has ever come
 to perfection."
	- Red Smith

Joel Becker
Principal Software Developer
Oracle
E-mail: joel.becker@oracle.com
Phone: (650) 506-8127

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-18 21:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-15 20:10 Smart fetch via HTTP? Jan Hudec
2007-05-15 22:30 ` A Large Angry SCM
2007-05-15 23:29 ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-16  0:38   ` Junio C Hamano
2007-05-16  5:25 ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-16 11:33   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-16 21:26     ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-16 21:54       ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-17  0:52       ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-17  1:03         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-17  1:04           ` david
2007-05-17  1:26             ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-17  1:45               ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-17 12:36                 ` Theodore Tso
2007-05-17  3:45           ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 10:48             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-17 14:41               ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 15:24                 ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-17 15:34                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 20:04                 ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-17 20:31                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 21:00                     ` david
2007-05-18  9:01                   ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-18 17:51                     ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-17 11:28         ` Matthieu Moy
2007-05-17 13:10           ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-17 13:47             ` Johannes Schindelin
2007-05-17 14:05               ` Matthieu Moy
2007-05-17 14:09               ` Martin Langhoff
2007-05-17 15:01                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 23:14                 ` Jakub Narebski
2007-05-17 14:50               ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-17 12:40 ` Petr Baudis
2007-05-17 12:48   ` Matthieu Moy
2007-05-18 18:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-18 18:33       ` alan
2007-05-18 19:01       ` Joel Becker
2007-05-18 20:06         ` Matthieu Moy
2007-05-18 20:13         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-05-18 21:56           ` Joel Becker [this message]
2007-05-20 10:30             ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-19  0:50       ` david
2007-05-19  3:58         ` Shawn O. Pearce
2007-05-19  4:58           ` david
2007-05-17 20:26   ` Jan Hudec
2007-05-17 20:38     ` Nicolas Pitre
2007-05-18 17:35       ` Jan Hudec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070518215607.GT24644@ca-server1.us.oracle.com \
    --to=joel.becker@oracle.com \
    --cc=Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.