From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1HpSnH-00085k-Qx for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:39 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpSnG-00085U-Cq for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:38 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HpSnE-00085E-Qn for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:38 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HpSnE-00085B-OJ for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:36 -0400 Received: from [212.85.152.101] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HpSnE-0001LU-Aw for grub-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2007 13:32:36 -0400 Received: from kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com (kotoba.oasis.nexedi.com [212.85.152.101]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF263D021D6A for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 23:37:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [??1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D403D015DBF for ; Sat, 19 May 2007 23:37:58 +0200 (CEST) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 19:32:34 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <20070518155009.GC16167@aragorn> <200705182035.35955.okuji@enbug.org> <20070519105534.GA9972@aragorn> In-Reply-To: <20070519105534.GA9972@aragorn> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705191932.35013.okuji@enbug.org> X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=0.17.2 X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) Subject: Re: CPUID module X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 17:32:38 -0000 On Saturday 19 May 2007 12:55, Robert Millan wrote: > > if cpuid --long-mode; then ...; else ...; fi > > The return value ($?) is set, but this syntax doesn't work. How can this > functionality be tested? Sorry, I am not sure. :( Possibly, not all planned features are implemented in the scripting engine... > Please have a look at the new patch. Looks good to me. Thanks, Okuji