All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus?
Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 12:17:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070520101717.GA22091@uranus.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070520094033.GA9645@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:40:33AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> 
> Do we really need an exhaustive set of configuration combinations to
> run through Kconfig to find possible missing symbols?  Or do we need a
> Kconfig lint to find them?
> 
> If we're going to make Kconfig warn on missing symbols only when they're
> attempted to be selected, you'll have to choose one of those two options.
> Choosing none is not an option.
The best solution would be to give kconfig full knowledge of all
Kconfig files. Then the "undefined symbol" is no longer a warning
but an error.

That would require a bit of kconfig surgery that we should do one day.
But giving kconfig full knowledge would gain a lot in several scenarios.
Turning the undefined symbol to an error is just one part of it.

	Sam

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-20 10:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-19 15:15 RFC: kconfig select warnings bogus? Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-19 18:09 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-19 22:17   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 22:49     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:09       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:17         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:25           ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:36             ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:41               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:51                 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:02                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:48               ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:55                 ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  0:13                   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:19                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  9:52                       ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 10:58                         ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:23                           ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 11:44                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 19:57                               ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-20 20:12                                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 20:41                                   ` Trent Piepho
2007-05-22 15:13                                     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 18:30                         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:46       ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20  0:53         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  1:04           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  8:31             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:38               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 11:47                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 11:57                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 13:09                     ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-20 13:50                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 14:39                         ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 14:53                           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:03                             ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:13                               ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:38                                 ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:46                                   ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-22 17:54                                     ` Stefan Richter
2007-05-22 17:59                                       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20 18:23                       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:05   ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:17     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:21       ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:29         ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:32           ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-19 23:23       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-19 23:22     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-20  0:02       ` Adrian Bunk
2007-05-20  0:11         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-05-20  9:43         ` Russell King
2007-05-20  9:40       ` Russell King
2007-05-20 10:17         ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2007-05-20 11:07         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-05-21  0:25 ` Roman Zippel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070520101717.GA22091@uranus.ravnborg.org \
    --to=sam@ravnborg.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bunk@stusta.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.