From: Bill Huey (hui) <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Bill Huey (hui)" <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 03:28:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521102856.GA20136@gnuppy.monkey.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070521101946.GC4593@gnuppy.monkey.org>
On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 03:19:46AM -0700, Bill Huey wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:36:39AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > you got the history wrong i think: the first version of lockdep was
> > released to lkml a year ago (May 2006), while the first time you
> > mentioned your lock contention patch was November 2006 and you released
> > it to lkml in December 2006 - so it was _you_ who was "replicating the
> > same work", not lockdep :-) And this was pointed out to you very early
> > on, many months ago.
>
> Yeah, and where do we disagree here again ? So I take it you're disagreeing
> with my agreement with you that lockdep came first ? Geez, think about that
> one for a bit. (chuckle) :)
Yeah, sorry about the wording reversal. It was unintentional. I tend to drop
minor words like "not" and stuff which can create confusion.
bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-20 10:30 [PATCH] lockdep: lock contention tracking Peter Zijlstra
2007-05-20 18:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 6:04 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 6:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 6:41 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 7:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 9:18 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 9:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-05-21 10:21 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 19:17 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:19 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 10:28 ` Bill Huey [this message]
2007-05-21 12:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-05-21 19:09 ` Bill Huey
2007-05-21 20:58 ` Jason Baron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070521102856.GA20136@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--to=billh@gnuppy.monkey.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.