From: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2o: fix notifiers when max_drivers is configured
Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 01:58:21 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070521165821.GA4077@APFDCB5C> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070520211659.91c84574.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 09:16:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > @@ -340,8 +341,7 @@ int __init i2o_driver_init(void)
> > spin_lock_init(&i2o_drivers_lock);
> >
> > if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64) ||
> > - ((i2o_max_drivers ^ (i2o_max_drivers - 1)) !=
> > - (2 * i2o_max_drivers - 1))) {
> > + !is_power_of_2(i2o_max_drivers)) {
> > osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64 and "
> > "a power of 2\n", i2o_max_drivers);
> > i2o_max_drivers = I2O_MAX_DRIVERS;
>
> Is there any particular reason why i2o_max_drivers must be a power of two?
> It seems a peculiar constraint.
I can't find the reason.
Subject: [patch -mm] i2o: eliminate a peculiar constraint on i2o_max_drivers
There is no reason i2o_max_drivers must be a power of two.
This patch eliminates such a constraint.
Cc: Markus Lidel <Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com>
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
---
drivers/message/i2o/driver.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6-mm/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6-mm.orig/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
+++ 2.6-mm/drivers/message/i2o/driver.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-#include <linux/log2.h>
#include "core.h"
#define OSM_NAME "i2o"
@@ -340,10 +339,9 @@ int __init i2o_driver_init(void)
spin_lock_init(&i2o_drivers_lock);
- if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64) ||
- !is_power_of_2(i2o_max_drivers)) {
- osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64 and "
- "a power of 2\n", i2o_max_drivers);
+ if ((i2o_max_drivers < 2) || (i2o_max_drivers > 64)) {
+ osm_warn("max_drivers set to %d, but must be >=2 and <= 64\n",
+ i2o_max_drivers);
i2o_max_drivers = I2O_MAX_DRIVERS;
}
osm_info("max drivers = %d\n", i2o_max_drivers);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-21 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-20 14:27 [PATCH] i2o: fix notifiers when max_drivers is configured Akinobu Mita
2007-05-21 4:16 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-21 16:58 ` Akinobu Mita [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070521165821.GA4077@APFDCB5C \
--to=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
--cc=Markus.Lidel@shadowconnect.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.