From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1756628AbXEVDx1@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756628AbXEVDx1 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 23:53:27 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754973AbXEVDxT
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 23:53:19 -0400
Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:53164
	"EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754946AbXEVDxS (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 21 May 2007 23:53:18 -0400
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Status of squashfs?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:52:15 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200705212352.17449.rob@landley.net>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

So Fedora uses squashfs, Ubuntu uses, squashfs, Gentoo uses squashfs...  It 
seems like the only place I can get a kernel _without_ squashfs is 
kernel.org.

Is there a reason for this?

Rob