From: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
To: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, Tom Talpey <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Peter Leckie <pleckie@melbourne.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH 11/15] knfsd: RDMA transport core
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 00:55:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070523145557.GN14076@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179931410.9389.144.camel@trinity.ogc.int>
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 09:43:30AM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
>
> > Tom, just curious but in the November there was actually a difference
> > between the sockets and RDMA versions, the latter didn't have this
> > line:
> >
> > rqstp->rq_res.buflen = PAGE_SIZE;
>
> I changed the defer logic quite a bit. In fact, I don't think it worked
> last November when you got the code originally. The latest code is at
> linux-nfs.org/~tomtucker/linux-nfs-2.6.git
Thanks. I have a checkout from there as of several days ago but
I haven't ported all my patches to use it yet.
> > So perhaps a better approach would be to slightly tweak the existing
> > generic defer & revisit logic to allow a transport to specify how
> > many bytes of transport header need to be preserved. Then the
> > transport-specific code needs very little code to support defer &
> > revisit, and doesn't duplicate multiple complex and subtle functions
> > which mess with svc_sock internals.
>
> The svcsock defer logic only supports a simple RPC without a page list.
> The logic even has a comment that says "FIX ME". So I assumed that in
> the fullness of time, any RPC could be deferred. If this is in fact the
> case, then I believe it is better to have a separate method. If it is
> not the case, then the defer logic can be made generic.
I'm not sure what you mean here.
Currently neither svc_defer() nor svc_rdma_defer() support calls longer
than just the head, meaning that WRITE RPCs (only) are dropped and
retried instead of deferred. This doesn't seem to be too much of a
problem; deferral happens so infrequently anyway.
If for some reason the svc_defer() was to have the "FIXME" actually
implemented, WRITE RPCs would magically start to be deferred rather
than dropped, for the sockets case and presumably also for the
RDMA case. Is this a problem?
Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
Apparently, I'm Bedevere. Which MPHG character are you?
I don't speak for SGI.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-23 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-18 17:45 [RFC,PATCH 11/15] knfsd: RDMA transport core Tom Tucker
2007-05-18 19:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-18 20:07 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-18 21:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-19 4:32 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-21 7:16 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-21 16:02 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-22 5:36 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-22 15:23 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-18 19:24 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-18 19:36 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-18 19:42 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-05-23 14:09 ` Greg Banks
2007-05-23 14:43 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-23 14:55 ` Greg Banks [this message]
2007-05-23 15:03 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 15:12 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-23 15:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 16:02 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-23 16:35 ` Greg Banks
2007-05-23 16:29 ` Greg Banks
2007-05-23 18:07 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 18:19 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-05-23 18:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 18:59 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-05-23 20:01 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-23 21:00 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-05-24 8:35 ` Greg Banks
2007-05-24 13:45 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-05-23 15:03 ` Tom Tucker
2007-05-21 7:11 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-21 10:02 ` Greg Banks
2007-05-21 15:58 ` Tom Tucker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070523145557.GN14076@sgi.com \
--to=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=pleckie@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.