Re: Fix problems with Holly's DT representation of ethernet PHYs

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 11:22:34PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On May 23, 2007, at 11:16 PM, David Gibson wrote:
> 
> > This patch fixes some problems with the way the Ethernet PHYs are
> > represented in the device tree for the Holly board.  This means
> > changes to the dts itself, and to the code with instantiates the
> > tsi108 ethernet platform devices based on the device tree.
> >
> > 	- First, and most importantly, the PHYs are given with an
> > identical 'reg' property.  This reg currently encodes the accessible
> > register used to initiate mdio interaction with the PHYs, rather than
> > a meaningful address on the parent bus (mdio in this case), which is
> > incorrect.  Instead we give the address of these registers as 'reg' in
> > the mdio node itself, and encode the ID of each phy in their 'reg'
> > propertys.  The PHY's unit name addresses are updated to match.
> > 	- Second, the PHYs give only "bcm54xx" as a compatible
> > property.  This is unfortunate, because there are many bcm54xx PHY
> > models, and they have differences which can matter.  We add a more
> > precise compatible string, giving the precise PHY model (bcm5461A in
> > this case).
> 
> Is the compatible really need here?  We are able to provide and bind  
> drivers based on MII_PHYSID1/2.  I don't see what putting the  
> compatible proper gets us.

That's a good point (except that having a node without compatible is
kind of odd).  At the moment the code which instantiates the platform
device looks at compatible to enable a workaround.  But actually that
workaround is holly specific, rather than related to the PHY model,
and so should be encoded differently.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson