From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758494AbXEXJ7G (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 05:59:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755888AbXEXJ6z (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 05:58:55 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:54944 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755761AbXEXJ6y (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 May 2007 05:58:54 -0400 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrea Righi Cc: Andrew Morton , Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] limit print_fatal_signal() rate Message-ID: <20070524095837.GA15689@elte.hu> References: <464ED258.2010903@users.sourceforge.net> <20070520203123.5cde3224.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070524075835.GC21138@elte.hu> <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.1.7 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrea Righi wrote: > Actually it seems that SIGKILLs are not printed. In > get_signal_to_deliver() we have: > > [snip] > @@ -1843,6 +1879,8 @@ relock: > * Anything else is fatal, maybe with a core dump. > */ > current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED; > + if ((signr != SIGKILL) && print_fatal_signals) > + print_fatal_signal(regs, signr); yeah. Either i implemented that and forgot, or someone else implemented it. :) Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 11:58:37 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] limit print_fatal_signal() rate Message-ID: <20070524095837.GA15689@elte.hu> References: <464ED258.2010903@users.sourceforge.net> <20070520203123.5cde3224.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070524075835.GC21138@elte.hu> <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <465551DC.4060603@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Righi Cc: Andrew Morton , Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: * Andrea Righi wrote: > Actually it seems that SIGKILLs are not printed. In > get_signal_to_deliver() we have: > > [snip] > @@ -1843,6 +1879,8 @@ relock: > * Anything else is fatal, maybe with a core dump. > */ > current->flags |= PF_SIGNALED; > + if ((signr != SIGKILL) && print_fatal_signals) > + print_fatal_signal(regs, signr); yeah. Either i implemented that and forgot, or someone else implemented it. :) Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org