Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix possible UDF data corruption

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Thu, 24 May 2007 23:23:21 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:

> [Andrew Morton - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:35:50AM -0700]
> | On Thu, 24 May 2007 21:20:17 +0400
> | Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> | 
> | > [Jan Kara - Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:59:35PM +0200]
> | > |   Hi Andrew,
> | > | 
> | > |   attached patch fixes possible data corruption in UDF - this bug was actually
> | > | introduced by one of my fixes :-( and should (if possible) go to Linus before
> | > | 2.6.22 is out (that's why I'm diffing against Linus's tree and not the
> | > | latest changes in -mm tree)... Thanks.
> | > | 
> | > | 								Honza
> | > | 
> | > | -- 
> | > | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> | > | SuSE CR Labs
> | > 
> | > Jan should I wait until Andrew has your patches included and
> | > only then (having taken into account your patches) produce my
> | > conversion?
> | > 
> | 
> | yes please - bugfixes come first.
> | 
> 
> Andrew, so could I assume that these patches are in your -mm tree
> to be able to work on UDF style conversion?
> 

Sure.  If something breaks, I'll fix it up.

If you take the two-patch approach (first patch is Lindent, second patch is
post-Lindent fixups) then it becomes easy at this end: the first patch is
the big one and if it breaks, I just re-run Lindent and regenerate it.